Personal Cigar Review: Padrón 1926 Serie Natural No. 2

3 comments

Cigar Details: Padrón 1926 Serie Natural No. 2

  • Vitola: Belicoso
  • Length: 5.5″
  • Ring Gauge: 52
  • Country of Origin: Nicaragua
  • Wrapper: Nicaragua
  • Binder: Nicaragua
  • Filler: Nicaragua
  • Factory: Tabacos Cubanica
  • Blender: Undisclosed
  • Price: $18.40
  • Release Date: 2002
  • Source: Developing Palates

Aaron-Loomis

 Aaron Loomis

Pre-light Experience

The rectangle pressed Padrón 1926 Serie Natural No. 2 had a light brown wrapper with a network of lightly raised veins and a fair number of wrinkles. The seams are very smooth and the tapered head is finished off with a nipple. The cigar seems a bit light for its size. There are two bands, with the primary being the traditional design for this line and sits on top of the secondary band which holds the serial number. The aroma from the wrapper is a very faint mix of wood and earth while the foot brings a much fuller mix of wood and pepper. The pre-light draw brings musty cedar.

First Third

The cigar begins with a mix of musty wood, earth and black pepper. The retrohale is musty wood and light earth. At an inch in, the black pepper has mellowed a fair amount. At an inch and a half, the black pepper picks back up and all of the components are even. The strength in this third was slightly above medium.

Second Third

As the second third begins, the musty wood and earth are slightly dry and a bit ahead of the black pepper. At a half inch in, the profile is fairly drying to my palate. The retrohale is now musty wood, earth and light black pepper. At an inch in, the black pepper has a very long finish. At an inch and a quarter, the wood gains some toast. As the third comes to a close, the toast becomes fairly heavy. The strength in this third remained at slightly above medium.

Final Third

The final third begins with musty and lightly charred wood, earth and mild black pepper. The retrohale is now musty wood and dry earth. At three quarters of an inch in, the black pepper is very faint. The cigar wraps up with musty and lightly charred wood, dry earth and faint black pepper. The strength in this third remained at slightly above medium.

Burn

The burn was a bit wavy at times. The cigar also went out once, requiring a re-light. The ash held on in inch and a half increments.

Draw

The draw was slightly looser than I prefer, but didn’t cause any issues with the smoking experience.

Overall

The cigar started well, but once the profile became a bit dry and the pepper had a long finish in the second third, things dropped down a notch and maintained that level the rest of the way. I know a lot of smokers clamor over this line, but to me, after I get through the initial flavor and complexity of the first third, the profile falls off a bit and becomes mundane and heavy. With the high price point and the lack of ongoing interest it provides, I don’t see myself coming back to the Padrón 1926 Serie Natural No. 2 on a regular basis.

Aaron Loomis

SCORE

5.75

Cost/Point

$3.20

Scoring System

Aaron
AveragePre
Light
GoodFirst
Third
AverageSecond
Third
AverageFinal
Third
GoodBurn
Very GoodDraw
AverageOverall
Personal Cigar Review: Padrón 1926 Serie Natural No. 2

Aaron LoomisPersonal Cigar Review: Padrón 1926 Serie Natural No. 2

Related Posts

3 comments

Join the conversation
  • Steven Genovese - August 25, 2025 reply

    I am 75 years older, begin the smoking cigar day around 8am in the backyard with a Padron 1926 NO. 2 Natural – every day. Beautiful construction, aged tobacco, 5 to 10 years, perfect draw and delicious ! I can taste those aged tobaccos ; strong but creamy. And Neptune always has them in stock, fresh – perfection. A great way to begin my day.

  • Salim Sebat - February 14, 2026 reply

    I’m wondering if you guys like any cigar at all,maybe you guys should something else,obviously you guys don’t like cigars in general.No 2 is absolutely a beautiful cigar and performs very well.

    Aaron Loomis - February 14, 2026 reply

    If you look through some reviews, you’ll find plenty of cigars we like. The point of our reviews is to find the cigars that are above the masses. To be able to do that requires some unpopular opinions, which seems to have flustered you. Opinions on flavor are going to vary wildly between people and don’t always line up. Since the experience of this cigar didn’t match with yours, your response is that we don’t know what we’re doing?

    We appreciate you reading our reviews.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *